Europe (change)
Shortcuts: Downloads Fedora Red Hat Network
Success Stories
Healthcare
InteraktContour
After an evaluation of the Microsoft Exchange option, it quickly became clear that the total cost of the solution
would be too high. Both the licensing costs and the costs involved in training the company’s IT staff would increase
substantially with Microsoft. And the implementation of the solution would require a major effort. The IT department
also had doubts surrounding the success of a migration from its previous system to an Exchange environment.
Stichting InteraktContour searched for an open source equivalent of Microsoft Exchange.
Download PDF:
[ 
|
|
|
|
]
McKesson
Using the solutions within the Red Hat Enterprise Healthcare Platform, McKesson was able to integrate the many healthcare applications it provides to its customers on a single middletier architecture. The flexibility of the Red Hat and JBoss solutions enabled the company to leverage all of its existing software and hardware and contributed to lowering the total cost of ownership for McKesson’s healthcare organization customers. In addition, The Red Hat Enterprise Healthcare Platform was optimized for the Intel dual and quad-core Xeon server platform, enabling McKesson to adopt an affordable, highperformance architecture for its customers.
Download PDF: [ ]
DST Health Solutions
Selected for their use of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JEMS to build a consumer-directed healthcare solution that was first-to-market, yielding immediate customer traction, increased market visibility, thus reflective of corporate leadership and success.
Download PDF: [ ]
Highmark
Highmark has seen numerous benefits since migrating to Red Hat - including cost savings, heightened performance and security, and excellent support resources. The company has experienced a 30% reduction in its hardware and software licensing costs. The ISB software that Highmark was previously running was priced per CPU. Because Highmark was able to make an almost 50% reduction of the amount of CPUs necessary for operation (78 CPUs to 42 CPUs), licensing costs were drastically reduced.
Download PDF: [ ]